Search results
From Termination-Portal.org
Jump to navigationJump to search
Page title matches
- ...e postprecessing after everything has been run (e.g., remove some outdated tools which should not have been run at all). Categories are run sequentially.1 KB (147 words) - 14:59, 12 December 2011
Page text matches
- | [[Tools:CaT]] | [[Tools:CaT]], [[Tools:TCT]]1 KB (169 words) - 07:58, 29 March 2010
- | [[Tools:CaT]] | [[Tools:CaT]], [[Tools:TCT]]2 KB (231 words) - 11:59, 8 June 2012
- ...y little effort and encourage developers of both provers and certification tools to consider these and other forms of non-standard termination problems. == Tools interested in participating ==718 bytes (98 words) - 10:46, 24 April 2009
- |text= [[Tools:A3PAT]], [[Tools:CeTA]], and [[Tools:CoLoR]] have agreed upon a common [http://cl-informatik.uibk.ac.at/softwar683 bytes (101 words) - 13:48, 7 October 2009
- the tools [[Tools:AProVE|AProVE]] and [[Tools:Jambox|Jambox]] in the versions that participated in the1 KB (191 words) - 14:52, 18 May 2009
- ...een installed to facilitate discussion about [[:Category:Tools|termination tools]] in general and the [[Termination Competition|termination competition]] in586 bytes (82 words) - 21:38, 11 November 2020
- For these tools to be used in the certification of critical systems and proof assistants, t * [[Tools:CoLoR|the CoLoR project]]1,005 bytes (141 words) - 09:57, 29 September 2009
- ...e postprecessing after everything has been run (e.g., remove some outdated tools which should not have been run at all). Categories are run sequentially.1 KB (147 words) - 14:59, 12 December 2011
- ...blems|results) that are (solved|certified) by all the tools in some set of tools? ...component allowing users to create custom experiments comparing different tools on a custom selection of termination problems. the document linked below ou3 KB (438 words) - 15:29, 1 April 2009
- The tools can give the following answers: The tools can give the following answers:999 bytes (141 words) - 13:17, 13 May 2024
- [[:Category:Tools|Tools]] (information about tools for automated termination analysis), and2 KB (227 words) - 13:37, 16 January 2024
- .../wiki/Termination_Competition) under "Category:categories" (like "Category:Tools") and add an entry to the navigation panel in the lhs.452 bytes (62 words) - 11:36, 30 December 2009
- ...competition are run in parallel to the tools which do not generate CPFs. (Tools may register several times for the same category: uncertified, and CPF-gene * Termination tools should provide a script which gets as only arguments the name of the TRS-fi3 KB (514 words) - 07:30, 3 August 2017
- | [[Tools:Matchbox]] | [[Tools:TCT]]6 KB (809 words) - 11:01, 28 June 2012
- Q: What is meant by "research group"? I would write "team developing tools" here and weaken "sends one member" to "may send one of its members". ...e help of other steering members, initiates PR activities to attract more tools.3 KB (412 words) - 10:21, 12 November 2008
- ...ove points and computed information (like date of submission, solved by xx tools, ...) ...uotas for experiments? Accessing non-approved examples? Using non-approved tools? Mainly Innsbruck is in charge and makes rules public2 KB (305 words) - 13:38, 2 June 2008
- ...tionals. Clearly, this is a severe restriction in the configuration of the tools. The consequences are however not always severe: ...certified tools already achieve over 62 % of the score of the uncertified tools. Some examples could not be handled at all (the main missing techniques see4 KB (699 words) - 04:07, 29 June 2012
- == Tools ==4 KB (504 words) - 02:08, 18 June 2020
- handled in very different ways by the individual tools (leading to potentially * [[Tools:AProVE]]3 KB (542 words) - 04:56, 19 November 2020
- * call for tools, certifiers, problems: May 26 * registration of tools: June 156 KB (942 words) - 13:45, 11 October 2015
- * Termination tools that can produce output in the new format and that participate in the certi867 bytes (126 words) - 14:40, 21 December 2009
- many research groups started to develop [[:Category:Tools | tools for fully-automated termination analysis]]. to spur the development of tools and new termination techniques.7 KB (913 words) - 08:15, 13 May 2024
- * Updates of Registered Tools: June 29, 2018 The score of a tool is determined by the number of other tools which could be beaten in that category.7 KB (1,049 words) - 09:55, 12 June 2020
- * Updates of Registered Tools: August 21, 2017 The tools will be started in their directory and obtain7 KB (962 words) - 08:48, 11 June 2018
- The score of a tool is determined by the number of other tools which could be beaten in that category. The tools will be started in their directory and obtain7 KB (1,068 words) - 09:25, 12 June 2020
- * Updates of Registered Tools: August 21, 2016 The tools will be started in their directory and obtain7 KB (1,056 words) - 21:06, 5 September 2016
- ...the experimental evaluation of logic solvers and other automated reasoning tools by providing a shared storage and computing infrastructure to store, manage ...ity tools and another score for looking only at the open source complexity tools. (RT)6 KB (957 words) - 19:34, 13 May 2014
- For technical reasons, the current tools only work on this compiled version of the original program. ...f a JBC problem based on given Java code is done manually, so the existing tools do not have to implement or use a Java compiler.8 KB (1,219 words) - 11:21, 31 January 2013
- * registration of tools: July 1 * updates of registered tools: July 29 (extended deadline)9 KB (1,240 words) - 11:55, 6 August 2015
- All (co-)authors of tools or benchmarks are encouraged (but not required) to give a 5-20min presentat The tools will be started in their directory, and the problem file name is given as t6 KB (954 words) - 08:32, 12 September 2023
- The score of a tool is determined by the number of other tools which could be beaten in that category. The tools will be started in their directory and obtain7 KB (999 words) - 09:55, 3 July 2020
- The score of a tool is determined by the number of other tools which could be beaten in that category. The tools will be started in their directory and obtain7 KB (1,024 words) - 06:44, 14 July 2021
- All (co-)authors of tools or benchmarks are invited (but not required) to give a 5-20min presentation * July 24: Tools and Problems Submission Deadline8 KB (1,232 words) - 14:09, 7 November 2022
- In the future the tools should also be able to provide certificates on the bound provided by the different tools, we propose the following11 KB (1,829 words) - 11:58, 8 June 2012
- ...the experimental evaluation of logic solvers and other automated reasoning tools by providing a shared storage and computing infrastructure to store, manage3 KB (389 words) - 17:43, 3 June 2014
- The tools will be started in their directory, and the problem file name is given as t The tools are expected to give an answer (YES, NO, MAYBE) in the first line on stdout6 KB (886 words) - 14:23, 8 May 2024
- ** For CPU time limit the competition can run faster (if the tools run multithreaded), but there is no incentive to do so.3 KB (491 words) - 15:50, 16 July 2008
- The non-winning tools get in both categories4 KB (635 words) - 17:27, 25 November 2008
- It was not (easily) possible to install auxiliary software needed by the tools. ...access remote machines from StarExec, which is needed for some commercial tools that are not willing to let their binaries run on StarExec itself.5 KB (841 words) - 12:17, 7 August 2014
- This category compares tools that automatically analyze termination of Haskell programs. If one consider4 KB (669 words) - 14:40, 21 December 2009
- ...gram termination. Now what? In this talk I will discuss the development of tools that build on termination proving techniques.5 KB (703 words) - 11:58, 26 August 2013
- ...pts to express integer transition systems as used by many program analysis tools as intermediate representation of programs.5 KB (822 words) - 17:36, 6 July 2015
